Re: [Evolution] Alternative to Evolution's trash handling

[Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>]

On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:26 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 12:07 -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:30 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: 
> > > On 09/29/2009 10:56 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
> > > > What about a move to trash allure? Seems like that might satisfy Everyone's concern...Sometimes the 
> > > > technically correct choice isn't always practical;-)
> > > You'll have to explain that. I don't know what you mean by "trash allure".
> > Just make the Trash folder act like the search folders. So you're
> > keeping the mark for deletion style but a copy(linkto the msg) is
> > visible in the "Trash" folder. This way you're not changing any
> > protocol or technology applied, your just playing with the way deleted
> > messages are seen...just a thought.
>
>
> 1.) Wouldn't fix the issue for people who use multiple MUAs.
> 2.) Deleted messages in what folders would be included in the Trash
> search folder?  Just INBOX, all personal folder, or all folders
> [including shared]?  Even just all-personal could get
> really-frackin-huge;  I know I wouldn't be too thrilled about a mail
> client that enumerated the contents of every folder I had access to.

As I said before, *this is what Evo already does*. See for example
http://www.go-evolution.org/FAQ#Why_do_I_have_two_Trash_folders_for_the_same_account.3F and 
http://www.go-evolution.org/FAQ#I_deleted_a_bunch_of_mail_but_my_mailbox_is_just_as_big_as_before._Why.3F

poc