Re: [Evolution] Alternative to Evolution's trash handling

On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On 09/29/2009 11:37 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:30 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On 09/29/2009 10:56 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
>>> What about a move to trash allure? Seems like that might satisfy Everyone's concern...Sometimes the technically correct choice isn't always practical;-)
>> You'll have to explain that. I don't know what you mean by "trash allure".
>> poc
> Just make the Trash folder act like the search folders. So you're
> keeping the mark for deletion style but a copy(linkto the msg) is
> visible in the "Trash" folder. This way you're not changing any protocol
> or technology applied, your just playing with the way deleted messages
> are seen...just a thought.

How is that different from the way the Trash folder already works? Trash 
*is* a search folder. The contents are physically in the same place they 
were before being deleted. They haven't been moved (and don't have to be 
moved back if they're undeleted). That's the whole point.

The Junk folder works the same way BTW.

I guess I'll vote for keeping things the way they are then ;)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]