On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 21:32 -0600, Akhil Laddha wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 22:44 -0400, Andrew Montalenti wrote:Hi evo-list, I just upgraded from Hardy -> Intrepid on Ubuntu, which bumped my Evolution version up to 2.24.3. Most of my VFolders are no useless,
Yeah, welcome to my hell.
since I had a whole bunch of VFolders that referenced other VFolders. These worked perfectly well in 2.22 but they don't work at all in 2.24.
Yup. Join the crowd.
This isn't just an esoteric use case. All my mail comes into various subfolders of my Inbox, based on the originating account. I then aggregate all this mail into a "Virtual Inbox" which I call "All Mail". All of my other VFolders then operate on the "All Mail" VFolder.
Ditto.
Therefore, this upgrade has broken all of my VFolders (all ~40 or so) except for the "All Mail" one.
Yup, and given the weak state of the VFolder search syntax this renders some kinds (combined and and or queries) of selections impossible. Get used to grubbing through folders and doing ad-hoc searches all the time.
Is this regression tracked anywhere (on bugzilla)?
Hrm. Tracked -- for some value of the word. I have been asking here and in bugzilla for months when this feature will be fixed and I have never gotten an answer. There is a bugzilla bug stating the problem but nothing beyond that. No ETA of when this will be fixed. No milestone selected. No sign that anyone is even working on it (if somebody is, update the bug and say so please!) It's like one of those bugs you file and it gets forever ignored without even attracting a single comment. The only bug activity on the tracking bug is that it was filed and a few people have CC'd on to it.
It's pretty serious,IMO.
I agree with you. I have seen no sign that the developers do as well though. In fact I find it absolutely amazing that code was allowed to land which knowingly rendered the overall product less complete than it was before it landed and this incompleteness has been allowed to linger on through two stable releases. Personally, if I were a betting man, I'd bet we never see vfolders of vfolders again. If it was viewed important enough by the development team to fix, then I think it would have probably been done by now. It will be one of those features that will be on the TODO list forever, always being bumped down by some other new, "important", items. If I am wrong about the above (and boy, would I love to be), then it would be nice to have some developer(s) chime in and answer the ETA questions. Tell us what your plans are, because without any knowledge of any plans, we have to just assume there are none. The fact that I have asked, directly, many times and not once gotten an answer is the only answer I have gotten so far. b.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part