Re: [Evolution] Accidental sorting



On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 09:42 -0700, Rick Knight wrote:
Reid Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:41 -0700, Rick Knight wrote:
  
Reid Thompson wrote:
    
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:16 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
  
      
True. I use "latest at the bottom" with threading and this sort of thing
has always annoyed me. One suspects that the devs don't use this mode or
it would have been fixed a long time ago.

    
        
+1 for fixing it -- I thought there was a bugzilla entry for this.. but
I can't seem to find it.  
_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
  
      
Isn't this normal behavior for other email clients (Thunderbird, 
Outlook)? I normally sort latest at the bottom, threaded, but I do at 
times need to sort on sender or subject. A single click on the column 
heading is very handy for this, so...
 +1 for leaving it be.

Thanks,
Rick
_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
    

I was commenting on the fact that threaded sorting with latest emails at
the bottom seems to be broken ( one click sorting on headers is fine
with me, I prefer it actually ).  The issue I see is that if you sort by
date such that latest emails are at the bottom, and you have threaded
sorting on, thread location is determined by the datestamp of the first
email in the thread rather than the last email in the thread.  This
results in threads that are 'up the ladder and out of the viewing
window' receiving new responses that I as the user do not see unless I
scroll up the viewing window.  I believe that the thread location in the
viewing window should be determined by the datestamp of the last email
received for the thread.
  
Reid,

Thanks for the explanation. I can see that this would be a problem. I've 
just installed 2.12 from svn and I don't see the problem you describe. 
Maybe it's been fixed?

Thanks,
Rick

My build from svn head last week still shows the issue ( see
attachement )...

Path: .
URL: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution/trunk
Repository Root: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution
Repository UUID: 9792ae6b-c725-0410-a7bc-87ac6a6ec1ac
Revision: 35145
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: ymarcheg
Last Changed Rev: 35145
Last Changed Date: 2008-03-07 09:18:33 -0500 (Fri, 07 Mar 2008)

I'll build again and check...

Attachment: Sshot-Evolution.png
Description: PNG image



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]