Re: [Evolution] Evolution does not support message's priority?

[Paul Smith <paul mad-scientist us>]

On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 11:53 -0700, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> Um, wrong answer.  He wanted to know if evolution supports message
> priority, not "marking as important".  Message priority allows the
> > > sender<< to assign a message priority from low = 5, to critical = 1
> to the message in the hopes that it helps the receiver determine what
> emails to read first.  This uses the "non-standard" mail header
> X-Priority.

I don't know how it's represented underneath in the SMTP headers, but
the feature I referred to DOES allow the sender to mark the message as
important (using Insert->Prioritize Message).  You don't get to give it
a discrete level from 1 to 5; it's either "important" or "normal".

But, if the SENDER marks it this way, when the recipient gets it it's
marked with the extra "exclamation point" icon and the summary line is
in red.