Re: [Evolution] ANNOUNCE: Evolution 2.10.0, Evolution-Data-Server 1.10.0, GtkHTML 3.14.0 and Evolution Exchange 2.10.0
- From: "Sankar P" <psankar novell com>
- To: "Harish Krishnaswamy" <KHarish novell com>
- Cc: Veerapuram Varadhan <VVaradhan novell com>, csaavedra alumnos utalca cl, evolution-list gnome org, evolution-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] ANNOUNCE: Evolution 2.10.0, Evolution-Data-Server 1.10.0, GtkHTML 3.14.0 and Evolution Exchange 2.10.0
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:00:24 -0600
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 12:44 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 23:04 -0400, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
El Tue, 13-03-2007 a las 13:08 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy escribió:
Hi All,
The Evolution Team is pleased to announce the release of
* Evolution 2.10.0
* Evolution-Data-Server 1.10.0
I'm sorry to spoil the fun, but you guys left
g_print ("\n\a Header string finally is ********** \n%s\n",
header_spec->str);
in e-d-s, camel/providers/imap/camel-imap-folder.c:2367, which is pretty
annoying, specially because of the '\a' (i.e., a beep every time a new
mail arrives or a mail is moved to another folder).
This appeared with a patch for this bug[1], I tried to warn but it seems
it got unnoticed. Hope it's not too late to fix this.
Claudio
[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400841
You are right - this *is* an annoyance and should have been pruned
before the release,
but it is a tad late - the tarballs are already out.
I also feel that this g_print statement should be conditional on the
debug flags turned on - and should not add noise to normal usage. The
use of \a looks superfluous too.
Varadhan/Sankar : Can you wrap the statement within a suitable DEBUG
level check and get the change committed asap. TIA.
I have committed a change by which the debug statement is made
conditional.
http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/evolution-data-server?view=rev&revision=7654
With the released version, you will get a beep sound only when Evolution
is launched from a terminal and there are new mails in a folder. IMHO,
that is not so critical that we need to make a dot-release for this
patch alone.
Thanks,
Harish
--
Sankar
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]