Re: [Evolution] spam filtering

[Reid Thompson <Reid Thompson ateb com>]

I've never used spamassion, but have been very pleased with bogofilter.


On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:02 -0400, on behalf of Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:24 -0400, Michelle Murrain wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 11:22 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> >
> > > You don't need to set it up, but you need to install it, since evo uses
> > > spamassassin to filter spam.  2.12 will also have the option to use
> > > bogofilter instead of spamassassin.
> >
> > OK, I got it. Which is better? Bogofilter or spamassassin?
>
> Bogofilter, in my experience.  It's not even close.  After training, my
> spamassassin never got better than 90% catch rate, which is still some
> hundred spams a day for me.  Bogofilter is 99.9% at least, probably
> better.  False positive rate is better too.
>
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-list mailing list
> Evolution-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list