On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:53 +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
That would be the way, BUT gnome-pilot support for palm has been broken for over a year now and nobody seems to care.
And frankly no one will care if your idea of a bug report is to say "it doesn't work".
My bugzilla entry has a pretty specific description of the problem. But since no developer reacted at all, I almost forget I filed it.
The major current problem appears to be related to people who are trying to build it (with various patches) against pilot-link 0.12 pre-releases, which are not intended to be production releases (Fedora FC4 in particular shipped with a config which was broken in almost every interface wrt to palm sync).
This is a very interesting remark which I will certainly try. It would have been nice if someone had made this remark as a reply to my bug report.
If you are going to gripe about bugs be specific. Otherwise people will just ignore you. [and with the blizzard of mails you have been sending out today that might be a good thing]
If you (or anyone) is going to filter messages from people based on the criterium "number of messages sent on a day" then that would imho be rather stupid. If people do not want to read my messages because do they not agree with the content, that's fine with me, such is life. If you want me to copy&paste my complete bug report here, I'd happily do that, I just think it's no use when I do not know beforehand if somebody is actually interested.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature