Re: [Evolution] Wish: Uncached IMAP folders

[Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj novell com>]

On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 22:31 +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> Le mercredi 19 avril 2006 à 13:52 +0100, Pete Biggs a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:39 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > [Replying to own post]
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:08 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > Link the cache folders you don't want to /dev/null? (I haven't tried
> > > > this and don't know about any possible side-effects).
> > >
> > > This makes no sense e.g. you might want to cache a subfolder but not its
> > > parent, or cache headers but not bodies, etc. etc. In my defense I
> > > haven't had my morning tea yet :-)
> >
> > Also it doesn't stop Evo from going of and getting things, it just
> > doesn't store it anywhere.
> >
> > For me, I would like a way of selectively marking folders for checking
> > for new mail - mail only appears in some of my folders (mainly as a
> > result of server side filtering), the vast majority either get populated
> > as a result of Evo filters, or things get put there manually.  At the
> > moment Evo takes ages to sort itself out when I first start it because
> > it goes through all my subscribed folders looking for new mail - I don't
> > want to untick the 'Check for new messages in all folders' because there
> > are some folders that I want to check - I don't want to unsubscribe the
> > folders because I use the (unchanging) information in them.
> Using the IDLE IMAP extension is probably better, though...

I don't think you quite understand how IDLE works (or, rather, /doesn't/
work)

> > P.