RE: [Evolution] Imap Hula/Evolution
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj novell com>
- To: Erik Slagter <erik slagter name>
- Cc: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: [Evolution] Imap Hula/Evolution
- Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 10:57:32 -0400
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 12:39 +0200, Erik Slagter wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 01:15 +0200, guenther wrote:
The issue is, that the Secure Connections options are named badly, or
rather used to be (getting back to this). Always means SSL (port 993),
Whenever Possible means StartTLS -- which IIRC starts with port 143 and
uses 993 later on, or some such.
Starttls means that both ends switch over to TLS mode, using the same
socket. Port 993 has nothing to do with it.
However, the real issue behind this is, that the options where named
badly. Since 2.6.0, this is corrected and clearly states No encryption,
TLS and SSL encryption respectively.
Hmmm, still not clear. TLS == SSLv3.
Something like
No encryption,
Starttls,
Secure IMAP (SSL)
would be more logical.
OTOH I don't get it why it should be configurable to enable/disable
starttls. It either is supported/handshaked on both ends or not.
because there are servers out there that advertise they support STARTTLS
but do not work properly so there needs to be a way for the user to
override. Just like there are POP servers out there that drop the user
if a command is issued that it doesn't understand, instead of simply
returning -ERR and continuing like it is supposed to do according to the
specs.
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.novell.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]