Re: [Evolution] Further compile problems for evo 2.4.1 on FC4

[Peter Robinson <pbrobinson gmail com>]

Hi Partha,

Thanks for the feedback, I wasn't too sure the best way as its the first time.

Also can someone look at the prototype for the header file as its well
over my head and I' like to move to evo 2.4.1 as I've noticed a few
weird bits running 2.4.0 with a 1.4.1.1 backend!

Pete

On 10/11/05, Parthasarathi Susarla <sparthasarathi novell com> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> Thanks for the patches. But patches should really be sent to
> evolution-patches gnome org 
>
> Thanks again,
> Cheers,
> partha
>
> On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 14:47 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > A couple of days ago I reported that I was having problems compiling
> > eds on FC4. The problem was due to FC4's strict policy of implicit
> > declarations. I worked it out and here's a basic patch. Now I'm having
> > similar problems with evo 2.4.1 with a new function that was added to
> > fix bug #264449 that didn't have the corresponding proto type added
> > the the .h file. The file is calendar/gui/e-calendar-table.[ch] with
> > the function being e_calendar_table_process_completed_tasks. I can
> > sort of see what needs to be added by aren't sure of the proper
> > combination. The .h file then needs to be included in e-task.c too
> > (with a
> > small patch for that attached too.
> >
> > I think also that redhat has a number of other includes fixed in a
> > patch that's included with their rpm.
> >
> > In the mean time I'm using eds 1.4.1.1 and exchange/webcal 2.4.1 with
> > evo 2.4.0 which has fixed the worst of the problems I was having with
> > exchange on 2.4
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Pete
> > _______________________________________________
> > Evolution-list mailing list
> > Evolution-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list