Re: [Evolution] Evo 2.0 + MailDir format
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Ow Mun Heng <Ow Mun Heng wdc com>
- Cc: Evolution-list <evolution lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evo 2.0 + MailDir format
- Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:41:02 +0800
> > Now, There is a workaround as I found on a post from guenther dated
> > Jan-05-2005. The workaround is rather crude but works, it entails
> > creating a separate Account, and making the "receiving server" to be
> > maildir format directories.
> Why is that crude? This is a better method since it exposes the data
> to external applications as well. The other way was a bit silly as it
> was entirely internal.
Well compared to the previous style, this is considered crude. What is
the other method? Are you referencing the 1.4.x method? I kinda like
that. Users get to specify a per-folder basis.
That is just stupid over-engineering.
> > I would like to go to the path of a Local IMAP server, but find that
> > that might be overkill for a Laptop system. :-D
> Why would that be any less crude than just setting up a 'local maildir' account?
There's the additional overhead of setting up a IMAP server. I think I
can go to the dovecot path it, being less hassle to set-up but given the
choice, I think I will go to postfix+cyrus. (right now it's sendmail)
So, it would be mroe crude then.
> > Its hard to distinguish from the address book who is whom since all I
> > get is "Heng, Ow"
> I think you have to edit the 'file as' entry manually.
If thats the case, I might really not have an option since it's a
company LDAP directory. The thing is, in 1.4.x it shows the full name
when I do a search in the GAL,(addressbook) but in 2.0 it doesn't show
up as that.
Did you file a bug?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]