Re: [Evolution] Future of Evolution

["Job 317" <job317 mailvault com>]

If this is true then you have provided the single most helpful answer to
my initial inquiry. I shall look more into how other email clients do
this. Perhaps a more skilled e-mail analyst might be able to tell the
difference between a truly bounced e-mail and an email bounced
artificially from an e-mail client.

Thank you for an insightful answer.

Regards,

JOB

On 21-May-2004 20:51:40 +0200, you wrote:
> I repeat, you can't bounce a message at the MUA. It's like not
answering
> a phone call after you've answered the phone. You maybe can return to
> sender, but it's not a bounce if it's been accepted by your MTA. If
it's
> been accepted by your MTA, to the spammer, he's got what he wanted.
>
> > However, it is a nice feature to make the spammer think that
> > your e-mail address does not exist.
>
> If it's been accepted by your MTA, then no matter what you do with
it,
> it's too late, the spammer has in his eyes won.
>
>
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 10:05, Job 317 wrote:
> > KMail and other clients have that capability.
> >
> > On 21-May-2004 17:57:16 +0200, you wrote:
> > > > Third, I would like a Bounce option for SPAM. Is this available?
If
> > not,
> > > > will it be?
> > >
> > > You can't do that at the MUA level, only at the MTA