[Evolution] Re: title encoding

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:35:41 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 21:21 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Still, i'm extremely loathe to, since it is a clear breakage of a pretty
simple set of rules from a not-particularly complex rfc. Seriously, MS
should know better, for such a fundamental issue.  We've had issues with
rfc compliance in that code and fixed it, i'm sure they can too.

Whatever happened to "be strict in what you send and flexible in what you
accept"? (I'm paraphrasing, but that was once the golden rule of the

Here here. I agree with reading the specs and that m$ is total crap.
But... when the mail comes in and the title is all junk (yes it happens to
me alot) and m$ users, who have no idea about specs or code, see
this then their response is to laugh and comment on what a piece of sh%t
linux and evolution is. "It doesn't happen in outlook!" i hear them say.

Evolution's lack of acceptance to m$ sh%t makes evolution look bad not
outlook! Simple but true.

<BR/> "The man who moved a mountain is the one who started taking away the small stones." Old Chinese Proverb
<BR/> --- <a href=http://www.harryspractice.com.au>Harry's Practice</a> --- 

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]