Re: [OT] why no line breaks? Was:Re: [Evolution] title encoding
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Jens Ansorg <liste ja-web de>
- Cc: Evolution users mailing list <evolution lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [OT] why no line breaks? Was:Re: [Evolution] title encoding
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:43:06 +0800
I dont know. when i break in the middle of a reply i have to hit delete or manually change the type to 'normal' because of an editor bug.
But its always sent as normal, and the copy i receive from the mailing list always looks fine.
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 20:25 +0200, Jens Ansorg wrote:
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 18:12 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 09:13 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> >
> > For some reason, it seems the subject isn't decoded. Can anyone spot if
> > there's a problem with the syntax, or if it's an Evo bug ? (in which
> > case I'll do a proper bugreport).
> The syntax is wrong. It looks like the mailer that sent it tried to
> do content quoted-printable line wrapping, which is totally incorrect
> in this context!
>
> The string can't contain any spaces, including linear white space.
> The whole token is supposed to be less than 76 characters for this
> purpose, so that any folding (wrapping on multiple lines) is outside
> the token boundaries.
>
> >From rfc2047, the relevent rfc, it is pretty clear and quite explicit
> about how the headers should be interpreted. Subject is a text field.
hi, a bit off topic but I wantet to ask this for ages now ;)
Your posts, Not Zed, often do not behave nicely. The lines do not wrap
and are difficult to read - see Attachement.
Why is that?
Could you try and configure your Evolution to not produce such long
lines? they are really bad to read
thank you
Jens Ansorg
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]