On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 00:28, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 19.42 skrev Rick DeNatale:I've had a lot of trouble lately in replying to message from folks like Jeffrey and Not Zed who reply directly to me and CC the list, without a reply-to header. The default for reply seems to be a direct reply rather than reply to list, which I guess makes sense, but it doesn't seem to have worked that way.OT rant: Anybody but anybody who replies /both/ to me and the list, be it reply/cc or cc/reply, immediately gets deleted from my inbox without me reading his message. That includes Ximian notables, Openldap notables, Postfix notables, whoever. I obviously read the lists I subscribe to and answer there. Obviously the above doesn't include private mail :) --Tonni
It's a lot easier to set up procmail to eliminate dups, than to change the behavior of a LARGE fraction of the internet. Replying to both, of course, happens because it's often easier few the human replying, and typically only wastes a few cycles. -- Dan Stromberg DCS/NACS/UCI <strombrg dcs nac uci edu>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part