Re: [Evolution] Character encoding in 1.4.x

[Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>]

On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 11:13, Mike Gifford wrote:
> Nice detective work Dan.
>
> That wrapped up the case pretty nicely..  I was just cutting & pasting
> in a quote and it didn't occur to me that there were curly quotes let
> alone that this might produce an error anywhere (looked fine to me and
> to many folks looking at the email).
>
> Since Microsoft 'smart' quotes are so common still (not sure if that's
> want the issue is or not).  I'd strongly suggest that in searching for
> character types/languages, that a curly-quote not give any indication on
> the language of the email.

character encoding is not really a language indicator, it is just a
character set. Each of the iso-8859-* charsets contain a max of 256
possible characters, each containing all of US-ASCII - the high bits
(>127 && <256) are extended characters, such as smart quotes, currency
symbols, accentuated characters and so forth.

If there is no way to represent a particular character in US-ASCII (or
the charset you chose), we have no choice but to find a charset that can
represent that character.

Jeff

> Mike
>
> On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 11:02, Dan Winship wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 15:14, Mike Gifford wrote:
> > > I've received notices from a couple people know that my messages aren't
> > > readable.  One person thought it was greek another croatian.
> > The problem is your signature. The apostrophes in it are curly-quotes,
> > so evolution has to find an encoding that has the curly-quote characters
> > in it to send the message in. If you retype it using the standard
> > straight apostrophe character, then it will be able to send it in
> > iso-8859-1.
> >
> > -- Dan
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com