On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 16:32, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 11:28, Cabral, Carlson wrote:That sure was Mark! For the record, I didn't "ask" another question. I just reported what happened to me while trying to use a feature that was very straight forward in previous versions of Evo. If that wasn't broken, why fix it then? That's the whole thing with 1.4. It's all broken at features that were there before, used to work, and now...this is what happens when gtk2 changes behaviour and makes things impossible to do anymore :-)
As has been said, and needs to be reiterated - most of the problems being reported in this thread are down to resources the Evolution developers have had thrust upon them, and over which they have no control. So lets take a breath and give them the applause they deserve for getting us a 1.4.0 release that's as stable as it is, considering that most all of the 1.3.x releases probably didn't get the heavy testing they needed and that 1.4.0 is now getting, to find these problems. From my POV, I run on Solaris, and so *none* of the 1.3.x builds I had access to were really usable at all, and that 1.4.0 works so well was a major surprise ;O) We have here a major upgrade of underlying libraries, and yet we have a product that's *more* stable than 1.2.4.99 ever was. And you *complain*? How much did you pay for this? Ta, -- o o mailto:Moredhel earthling net /v\ark R. Bowyer http://www.bowyer.screaming.net Mark Bowyer Sun COM `-' --------------------------------------- /"\ ...fingerprint = 7924 9E9E 7B91 225E B065 \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign 1024D/19BC72F6 39D0 551D ABE6 1514 0DC1 X Against HTML Mail -------------------------------------------- / \ SNITTERFIELD (n.) Office noticeboard on which snitters (q.v.),cards saying 'You don't have to be mad to work here, but if you are it helps !!!' and slightly smutty postcards from ibiza get pinned up by snitterbies (q.v.)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part