Re: [Evolution] Filtering on bcc
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
- To: Wolfgang Lumpp <wol msc-ge com>
- Cc: evolution lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Filtering on bcc
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:30:28 -0400
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 03:53, Wolfgang Lumpp wrote:
Hi,
not possible.
An arriving mail have no bcc:. Its deleted by the MTA.
No. It's deleted by the MUA. The MTA never sees it.
Every bcc: adress generates an extra mail with the adress in To:
No. Every Bcc: address generates an extra recipient. It doesn't affect
the To: header at all.
The addresses in the To:, Cc: and Bcc: headers of the mail itself can
bear _no_ relation to the actual recipients of the mail.
Any correlation you see is just a coincidence, often caused by the fact
that most mail clients will _infer_ recipients based on the To:, Cc: and
Bcc: headers. That's normal and intuitive behaviour but not mandatory.
The headers of the mail are purely cosmetic and largely irrelevant. You
should avoid using them for filtering.
--
dwmw2
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]