Re: [Evolution] Glean Outlook snapshots for ideas
- From: guenther <guenther rudersport de>
- To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
- Cc: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>, evolution lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Glean Outlook snapshots for ideas
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:13:54 +0200
I suppose it's feasible for Evolution to _notice_ a clueless user
replying to a thread and then changing the subject. Upon attempting to
send a message with In-Reply-To but no _("Re: ") in the subject line, it
could do something like...
-------------------------------------------------------------------
| You have replied to a message but changed the original subject. |
| Do you mean your message to be a continuation of the same |
| thread or to start a new thread? |
| |
| -New thread- -Same thread- -Explain- -Don't ask me again- |
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, *this* is a good idea, bravo. I like this. Have you already filed
it in bugzilla?
One addition: To have the "Don't ask me again" work *and* have the
choice, this should be options rather than buttons.
I do precisely this for my mailing lists -- messages with References or
In-Reply-To but no 'Re:' are trapped for moderation, and usually
rejected. Likewise messages with 'Re:' but no references.
Wondering: Trigger on "missing 'Re:'" or trigger on "not including large
parts of original Subject"? What about "new-subject (was: old-sbuject)"
messages?
...guenther
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0 ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]