Re: [Evolution] filters.. getting only one rule to fire and not several.
- From: Cormac Long <cormac_long yahoo co uk>
- To: evolution ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] filters.. getting only one rule to fire and not several.
- Date: 14 Nov 2002 14:59:54 +0000
thats a good idea.. never saw that one!
a good idea for the docs to be updated to reflect this.. it's definitely a non-standard way of filtering, but I can now see that its much more advanced if you can force multi-rule processing and "stop processing" as desired.
Thanks for the reply.. everything looks like its working now
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 14:25, Enver ALTIN wrote:
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 16:12, Cormac Long wrote:
> works on the principle of ordering rules by precedence and the first
> to fire is the only one to fire.
Did you ever happen to add a "Stop processing" action?
Enver ALTIN (a.k.a. skyblue) - Software developer, generic solvent
http://enver.casdb.com/ - mailto: ealtin at casdb dot com
http://enver.casdb.com/CV.html - Just me, myself and I.
The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be
regarded as a criminal offense.
-- E. W. Dijkstra
evolution maillist - evolution ximian com
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
] [Thread Prev