Re: [Evolution] filters.. getting only one rule to fire and not several.

[Cormac Long <cormac_long yahoo co uk>]

Ah!

thats a good idea.. never saw that one!

a  good idea for the docs to be updated to reflect this.. it's definitely a non-standard way of filtering, but I can now see that its much more advanced if you can force multi-rule processing and "stop processing" as desired.

Thanks for the reply.. everything looks like its working now

On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 14:25, Enver ALTIN wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 16:12, Cormac Long wrote:
> > works on the principle of ordering rules by precedence and the first
> > to fire is the only one to fire.
>
> Did you ever happen to add a "Stop processing" action?
>
> -HTH
> --
> Enver ALTIN (a.k.a. skyblue)   - Software developer, generic solvent
> http://enver.casdb.com/        - mailto: ealtin at casdb dot com
> http://enver.casdb.com/CV.html - Just me, myself and I.
>
> The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be
> regarded as a criminal offense.
> 		-- E. W. Dijkstra
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Regards,

   Cormac

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________