[Evolution] RE: Current pet-hates for evolution

I do and for pretty much the same reasons, which are a good techniques
for handling the issues Pascal describes..

Maybe he should write them up and publish them as a 'how to' or
in one of the Linux 'zines and if enough people adopt them
they will also complain.

Anyway, I'm #2 on the list for this request.   Anyone else supporting
this effective way of handling mail, spam and resources?


Subject: Re: [Evolution] Current pet-hates for evolution
From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
To: Pascal DeMilly <list evolution newgenesys com>
Cc: Evolution Mailing list <evolution ximian com>
<1000844323 26356 83 camel dell>  <1000886275 17275 21 camel lancelot>
<1000908579 669 8 camel dell>  <1000910112 25520 16 camel lancelot>
<1000932662 2556 17 camel dell>
Date: 19 Sep 2001 18:13:45 -0400

On Wed, 2001-09-19 at 16:51, Pascal DeMilly wrote:

The only problem with this solution is that Evolution use 2 lines per
IMAP account. One for the account and one for the Inbox folder. I
wish it would see that I subscribe to only one folder and inline it
the account name.

I'm sorry, but this won't ever happen. I don't see anyone else even
wanting this feature anyway.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]