Re: [Evolution] RE: Current pet-hates for evolution

The reason this won't (can't) happen is because the server node
represents the server, not a mailbox. Eventually we will be attaching
options to the server for when you click on it. This can't happen if you
kludge around not showing INBOX if it's the only folder you have.

I am 100% AGAINST adding this feature.


On Wed, 2001-09-19 at 19:41, Anton J Aylward, CISSP wrote:
I do and for pretty much the same reasons, which are a good techniques
for handling the issues Pascal describes..

Maybe he should write them up and publish them as a 'how to' or
in one of the Linux 'zines and if enough people adopt them
they will also complain.

Anyway, I'm #2 on the list for this request.   Anyone else supporting
this effective way of handling mail, spam and resources?


Subject: Re: [Evolution] Current pet-hates for evolution
From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
To: Pascal DeMilly <list evolution newgenesys com>
Cc: Evolution Mailing list <evolution ximian com>
<1000844323 26356 83 camel dell>  <1000886275 17275 21 camel lancelot>
<1000908579 669 8 camel dell>  <1000910112 25520 16 camel lancelot>
<1000932662 2556 17 camel dell>
Date: 19 Sep 2001 18:13:45 -0400

On Wed, 2001-09-19 at 16:51, Pascal DeMilly wrote:

The only problem with this solution is that Evolution use 2 lines per
IMAP account. One for the account and one for the Inbox folder. I
wish it would see that I subscribe to only one folder and inline it
the account name.

I'm sorry, but this won't ever happen. I don't see anyone else even
wanting this feature anyway.


evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]