RE: [Evolution] IMAP Trash folder?

[Miles Lane <miles megapathdsl net>]

On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:50, Eric Lambart wrote:
> 10/24/2001 9:03:59 AM, Mike Sangrey <msangrey bluefelthat org> wrote:
>
> > How about instead of "Trash" it's called "vTrash"?
> >
> > Sometime in the future (after 1.0) you could enable the user to choose
> > either a "Trash folder" or a "vTrash folder".
>
> Yeah, I seriously think the best (and SAFEST) interim solution should indicate _somehow_ that it is a 
> vFolder.
>
> I like your idea, but wouldn't it be more a lot more consistent to simply put it in the vFolder tree?  
> Someone might think 
> "vTrash" was a typo; but if it was listed separately from all the other (real) folders, new users would 
> realize something 
> was up and probably learn about vFolders in the process... and, we wouldn't have a vFolder sneakily hiding 
> amonst the 
> real folders--which just doesn't seem right to me.

I seem to recall adding a feature request a long time ago that the
icons used to indicate VFolders would be different from the IMAP
and local mail folders.  Personally, I think this would provide
a big boost in clarity of understanding for users.  Come to thing
of it, since a user can have both a POP account and an IMAP account
set up, showing different icons for local and remote (IMAP) folders
would be useful, too.

        Miles