RE: [Evolution] IMAP Trash folder?
- From: Mike Sangrey <msangrey BlueFeltHat org>
- To: Evolution List <evolution ximian com>
- Cc: Eric Lambart <lambart got net>
- Subject: RE: [Evolution] IMAP Trash folder?
- Date: 24 Oct 2001 13:09:24 -0400
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 12:50, Eric Lambart wrote:
10/24/2001 9:03:59 AM, Mike Sangrey <msangrey bluefelthat org> wrote:
How about instead of "Trash" it's called "vTrash"?
Sometime in the future (after 1.0) you could enable the user to choose
either a "Trash folder" or a "vTrash folder".
Yeah, I seriously think the best (and SAFEST) interim solution should indicate _somehow_ that it is a
I like your idea, but wouldn't it be more a lot more consistent to simply put it in the vFolder tree?
Someone might think
"vTrash" was a typo; but if it was listed separately from all the other (real) folders, new users would
was up and probably learn about vFolders in the process... and, we wouldn't have a vFolder sneakily hiding
real folders--which just doesn't seem right to me.
I don't think people would think `vTrash' is anymore a typo than
`vFolders'. And the `v' leans toward a commonly accepted convention.
At least it "feels" that way to me.
Also, if you stick `Trash' down in `vFolders' I would have assumed THAT
`Trash' folder had something to do with stuff deleted out of `vFolders'
and that REALLY gets confusing.
BTW, I haven't tried it, but what is suppose to happen if someone drags
and drops an email from a folder to `Trash'? Does that do the right
thing? You'll have people do that, you know. Maybe this was discussed
already and I missed it.
msangrey BlueFeltHat org
"The first one last wins."
"A net of highly cohesive details reveals the truth."
] [Thread Prev