[Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?
- From: Dan Kuykendall <dan kuykendall org>
- To: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik ireland sun com>
- Cc: OO-List <discuss openoffice org>, Evo-List <evolution ximian com>, Glue-List <glue gnu org>
- Subject: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 09:39:02 -0800
Like, GNU stands for Gnu's Not Unix.
Thus the "extra" O :-)
Sorry, those went out of fashion in the 80s.
I have to agree.
But this is totally immaterial as long as the 'OGS' part means Open
Groupware Standards and the result that come out of it is :
a) standard
Yes
b) open
Yes
c) agreed upon by all of us
Will probably never happen, but "agreed upon by most" will be enough.
d) all libraries are licenced under LGPL or some other licence
with even less strings attached.
Yep
e) nice, multi-system (UNO, CORBA, XPCOM, plain C, etc.) APIs
Im going for XML-RPC at this point.
Seek3r
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]