[Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?
- From: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik ireland sun com>
- To: Dan Kuykendall <dan kuykendall org>
- Cc: OO-List <discuss openoffice org>, Evo-List <evolution ximian com>, Glue-List <glue gnu org>
- Subject: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 18:30:51 +0000 (GMT)
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Dan Kuykendall wrote:
e) nice, multi-system (UNO, CORBA, XPCOM, plain C, etc.) APIs
Im going for XML-RPC at this point.
That's the API and protocol difference - if the API is agreed on, any
system (or app developer) can just write a skin deep wraper and make easy
use of it. And won't have to keep writing yet another OGS XML-RPC talking
libarary ...
Seek3r
Sander
One day a tortoise will learn to fly
-- Terry Pratchett, 'Small Gods'
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]