Re: [Evolution] gtkhtml 1.0??
- From: Lonnie Borntreger <email borntreger com>
- To: Evolution List <evolution ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] gtkhtml 1.0??
- Date: 03 Dec 2001 17:29:39 -0600
So, if I want the latest and greatest (including 1.0+), do I stick with
the HEAD? IOW, will 1.0 changes be brought back into HEAD eventually,
and will the new features occur in HEAD, or have the 1.0+ streams
already been branched and HEAD is dead?
On Sat, 2001-12-01 at 12:47, Not Zed wrote:
On Sat, 2001-12-01 at 06:25, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 19:48, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> > Here's a bunch of (probably) stupid questions.
> >
> > Any particular reason it was branched? Just curious since I though the
> > "normal" way was to remain in one branch until 1.0 then branch new
> > development.
> >
> the reason is to continue development for the 1.0.x series in one
> branch, and for 1.2 in HEAD. I suppose all the changes made to
> gtkhtml-1-0-branch will be committed to HEAD soon.
It is basically because gtkhtml is so closely tied to evolution and
evolution 1-0 must remain as stable as possible that both were branched
together.
--
TTFN,
Lonnie Borntreger
------ ------ ------
Our mission is to authoritatively promote timely methods of
empowerment so that we may endeavor to collaboratively supply
inexpensive opportunities to exceed customer expectations
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]