Re: [Evolution] Ximian vs. GNOME icons
- From: Andrew Smith <asmith wpequity com>
- To: Ben FrantzDale <bfrantzdale hmc edu>
- Cc: evolution ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Ximian vs. GNOME icons
- Date: 03 Aug 2001 15:38:56 -0400
I especially like the tigert icons. It would be a shame to see them go
unused. The evolution icons are a bit too "soft" for my liking. Almost
trending toward the mozilla modern theme.
-a.
On 03 Aug 2001 14:11:29 -0400, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
As Evolution progresses I'm finding that the icons are drifting away
from the stock GNOME icons. Furthermore the new icons seem to be
adopting a different style.
I recall that there may be plans to let themes define buttonbar icons.
(Does anyone know the status of that idea?) Untill that happens, though,
It seems that the Ximian icons, and thus Evolution is inconsistant with
the rest of the GNOME desktop.
Can anyone comment on this?
Sincerely,
Ben FrantzDale
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - evolution ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]