[Evolution] post-GNOME 1.4 success
- From: Karel P Kerezman <rael zero kgon com>
- To: Evolution Mailing List <evolution ximian com>
- Subject: [Evolution] post-GNOME 1.4 success
- Date: 12 Apr 2001 17:30:35 -0700
Okay, so this isn't vital information, but I thought it might be useful
for somebody. Today I spent most of my workday running 'rpm -tb
suchandsuch.tar.gz' against the source tarballs for GNOME 1.4. Several
of them wouldn't go, but those weren't important. Many of them had
mangled spec files, which I tweaked into submission.
To make a long story short, I updated the key GNOME packages, avoided
anything that my Evo snaps had a "newer" version of, and went back into
X, GNOME and Evo without a hitch. Only time will tell if I've mangled
something and just don't know it yet, but so far so good.
I'll be glad to see Ximian packages for this thing, I don't mind telling
you. Rolling your own is all well and good, but it's also a good thing
there weren't any emergencies today that demanded more of my attention
(and a working desktop environment).
fwiw:
- Evo 0.9 +cvs.2001.03.27.09.00, which (near as I can tell by reading
this list) seems to be among the last reasonably-usable snapshot builds.
- Redhat 6.2 "core" (heavily, heavily patched since then, among other
things)
- Linux kernel 2.4.0
- XFree86 4.0.2 (Voodoo3 chipset, 1280x1024x16bit)
- Enlightenment 0.16.5 (with some odd extras/whatnot from the newer CVS
code.)
- And other stuff you probably aren't interested in. *g*
--
---
Karel P Kerezman - IS Admin, Entercom Portland LLC - http://zero.kgon.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gets parity errors under load.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From the Canonical Fulldeckisms List: http://www.herbison.com/canon
---
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]