Re: [HC Evolution] Re: libole2 -> gnomevfs backend?
- From: "Sarel J. Botha" <sjbotha email com>
- To: "'evolution helixcode com'" <evolution helixcode com>
- Subject: Re: [HC Evolution] Re: libole2 -> gnomevfs backend?
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 21:04:51 +0200
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 10:38:04AM -0800, Jeremiah Cornelius wrote:
A single-file is terrible when it becomes corrupted!
Unless it's well-designed and it's possible to rebuild it when it gets
corrupted. In the end a file could be a file-system just like ext2. It
would be specialized and better though.
The only thing I can think of that can happen to a file but not a directory
is the entry in the partition table that could get corrupted. But couldn't
that happen with a directory too? I've never lost one single file due to
ext2 failing on me.
Real, everyday-users use systems like Notes and Exchange as indexed file
repositories, and maintain sensitive and/or critical materials here. (Draw
your own conclusions about what this indicates in regard to the
state-of-the-art in file system access!)
erm, you're calling Exchange 'state-of-the-art'? :)
I have seen _many_ documents lost forever, becase a .pst file was corrupted,
and the Mailbox "Repair" tool returns less than .1 of the original contents.
Which indicates to me that .pst files are badly designed.
--
------------------
Sarel Botha
sjbotha email com
------------------
99 little bugs in the code, 99 bugs in the code,
fix one bug, compile it again...
101 little bugs in the code....
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]