Hi Jens, Am Donnerstag 01 September 2011, um 15:01:25 schrieb Jens Getreu: > Hello Christian, > > (I answer you in English to leave a trace for other guys using > evolution-kolab). :-) > I compiled you sources, everything went well without problems. > > You will find the result as (unofficial) Debian packages here: > > http://getreu.net/public/downloads/software/evolution-kolab/evolution-kolab > -20110831-branch-dev_kc_speed/ > > evolution-kolab-dev_0.2.1_amd64.deb > evolution-kolab_0.2.1_amd64.deb Okay, since not everyone will be able to follow my PS. in German, here's for the rest of them: I've sent an unofficial distribution tarball to Jens, who was kind enough to compile it into a package for Debian/Squeeze. This tarball was generated from the dev_kc_speed git branch and contains some speedup fixes (still much work left to be done in that area) as well as a fix for a Horde data parsing issue. Since I cannot currently increment the patchlevel, the tarball contains the 0.2.1 version information, but differs from the already-released one with the same version. It will be a while (presumably end of September) before I can release the next official version. Maybe I will do a tarball-only release (no packaging) before that. > I also had a first try. The todo list issue seems to be solved for me > too and indeed things are a little faster. As my internet link is > _very_ slow from here, it is better to use evolution in offline-mode > and then switch back to online-mode for synchronisation. > Especially browsing the calendar is much too slow. To make up a little for evolution-kolab's intrinsic sluggishness(*), at least your network connection to your Kolab server should be quick. :-) But yes, using offline mode should be a suitable workaround for now. > The whole seems to be quite stable. I will migrate my data on > the kolab server and work with it! Please be sure to make proper backups! While Kolab itself is much robust and stable, evolution-kolab is still very young. Though we did not encounter a case of data corruption or evolution-kolab otherwise eating our PIM information yet, proper precaution should be taken when using evolution-kolab. > Thanks a lot for your help! Welcome. > Kind regards > Jens (Bye)^2, Christian (*) We're working on that > Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011 à 09:57 +0200, Christian Hilberg a écrit : > > Hallo Jens, > > > > Am Mittwoch 31 August 2011, um 23:18:58 schrieb Jens Getreu: > > > Hallo Christian, > > > > > > ja bitte... > > > > Okay, hier kommt die Kiste. > > > > > 1 MB shouldn't be too much. > > > > Gut. > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Tervitades > > > > > > Jens > > > > Viele Grüße, > > > > Christian > > > > PS.: Der Tarball trägt zwar noch die Versionsnummer 0.2.1, unterscheidet > > sich aber von dem veröffentlichten. Der Bugfix ist drin, und auch > > schon einige Geschwindigkeitsverbesserungen. Allerdings kann ich > > momentan die Versionsnummer noch nicht hochsetzen, das kommt erst > > kurz vor dem tatsächlichen Release der nächsten Version. Du hast > > jetzt einen Git-Abzug vom Branch dev_kc_speed vom 31.08.2011 > > (commit 39a87c4193bda87a7f284394870d16307cb35759) bzw. einen daraus > > erstellten Distribution-Tarball. -- kernel concepts GbR Tel: +49-271-771091-14 Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48 D-57072 Siegen http://www.kernelconcepts.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.