Re: [Evolution-hackers] Isolated unit test status report

[Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>]

On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 23:01 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> I went ahead and committed it for 3.8.
>
> We'll see if this has any impact on the GDBusConnection leak, but it's
> an improvement regardless.

        Hi,
easy to test it with Tristan's [1], isn't it? You'll realize it'll not
help, just the opposite, as I expect that creating a factory connection
for each created book/calendar client only adds more things to be done
on various layers, thus makes opening generally slower.

Just my untested opinion.

The issue with [1] is also related to [2], if it'll help you to properly
fix them both. If you do not like the already available tool for
testing, then I can provide a simple test.c, which will exhibit the same
issue - I only wanted to use something in place, to exhibit the
regression from 3.6 code.
        Bye,
        Milan

[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693461
[2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693464