Re: [Evolution-hackers] Did 3.4 just get really slow?

[Sasa Ostrouska <casaxa gmail com>]

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Sasa Ostrouska <casaxa gmail com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Xavier Bestel <xavier bestel free fr> wrote:
>>
>> I don't know, but Evo takes several minutes to start with tracker, vs a few
>> seconds without.
>>
>
> I have still Evo 2.26.x and sometimes tracker is really a pain. It is
> useful but really
> on my machine i disable it, because of troubles with reindexing all of
> the times.
>
> Rgds
> Saxa
>
>>
>> David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org> a écrit :
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
>>> > I'm using Debian, and found Evo getting slower and slower (I've got
>>> > something like 44K messages in my inbox).
>>> > Now I just removed Tracker from my system, and it's snappy again.
>>> > Happy me.
>>>
>>> Hm, that would affect Evolution's *own* performance? It was taking about
>>> 40ms for each call to imapx_expunge_uid_from_summary(), probably in
>>> camel_folder_summary_remove_uid(). Most of the time was spent waiting on
>>> a futex.
>>>
>>> I got bored after a couple of hours and went to bed. Left it running
>>> overnight to see what happened, and by the morning it had crashed:
>>>
>>> camel-imapx:ERROR:camel-imapx-server.c:1373:imapx_untagged: code should
>>> not be reached
>>> Aborted
>>>
>>> That's an abort when it receives a FETCH response for a message it
>>> didn't think it knew about. But it *had*. I'll do a better analysis,
>>> post a log and file a bug later.
>>>
>>> --
>>> dwmw2
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> evolution-hackers mailing list
>> evolution-hackers gnome org
>> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
>>