Re: [Evolution-hackers] Did 3.4 just get really slow?

[Xavier Bestel <xavier bestel free fr>]

I don't know, but Evo takes several minutes to start with tracker, vs a few seconds without.

David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org> a écrit :

On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> I'm using Debian, and found Evo getting slower and slower (I've got
> something like 44K messages in my inbox).
> Now I just removed Tracker from my system, and it's snappy again.
> Happy me. 

Hm, that would affect Evolution's *own* performance? It was taking about
40ms for each call to imapx_expunge_uid_from_summary(), probably in
camel_folder_summary_remove_uid(). Most of the time was spent waiting on
a futex.

I got bored after a couple of hours and went to bed. Left it running
overnight to see what happened, and by the morning it had crashed:

camel-imapx:ERROR:camel-imapx-server.c:1373:imapx_untagged: code should not be reached
Aborted

That's an abort when it receives a FETCH response for a message it
didn't think it knew about. But it *had*. I'll do a better analysis,
post a log and file a bug later.

-- 
dwmw2