Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches
- From: Patrick Ohly <patrick ohly gmx de>
- To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
- Cc: Evolution Hackers <evolution-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora builds with 2.32.2+ patches
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:54:50 +0200
On Fr, 2011-04-08 at 16:31 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 15:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Do, 2011-04-07 at 11:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > Once this passes muster, I'll push these patches (probably *without* the
> > > NTLM bits, if you're looking closely at what I included) to the
> > > gnome-2-32 branches and perhaps start doing a 'final call' for 2.32.3
> > > candidate bugs/patches.
> >
> > Please consider backporting the fixes for e_cal_new_system_*(). They are
> > unusable in 2.32.x but I intended to use them soon in MeeGo.
> >
> > I'm not sure which fixed from the master branch are all needed, I hope
> > Matthew and Milan can provide a list.
>
> I am trying hard not to bother Matthew and Milan; I don't want the
> continued maintenance of the gnome-2-32 branch to be a burden to them in
> any way.
I know, but Matthew had already kindly offered some help here.
> I have cherry-picked the patches from master which look relevant; please
> could you test what is currently in
>
> http://git.infradead.org/evolution-data-server-2.32.git
> git://git.infradead.org/evolution-data-server-2.32.git
Listing sources shows local:/system instead of local:system and opening
"local:system" also still fails.
Milan pointed to the history of e-source.c, but I don't see which
(other?) commits are needed to fix these issues.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]