Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

[Chenthill <pchenthill novell com>]

On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 06:15 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
> > We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though
> > they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold
> > true ;)
> 
> A compromise might be to only migrate the pages with current and
> accurate information to l.g.o, and keep go-evolution.org around as a
> historical archive.  Archived pages brought back to life at a later date
> could be migrated individually.  It -is- a wiki, after all.
Makes sense. How about putting the architecture and other historic data
on roadmaps into www.gnome.org/projects/evolution and current pages in
l.g.o ?

Close go-evolution.org once for all.

- Chenthill.
> 
> Might be interesting to compile a list of pages we still maintain or
> care about.  I have a few not listed on the front page (BugzillaTopics
> and ReleaseHOWTO, for example).
> 
> Perhaps a bigger issue is converting the page markup.  I've noticed
> syntactic differences between the two sites [1], but I don't even know
> what wiki software the two sites are using.  Need to see if there's
> markup migration scripts out there.
> 
> Matthew Barnes
> 
> 
> [1] live.gnome.org's markup syntax seems way more expressive and is
>     actually DOCUMENTED! (http://live.gnome.org/HelpOnEditing)  Unlike
>     our own. (http://www.go-evolution.org/Help:Editing)  Not to mention
>     the style sheets are prettier.