Re: [Evolution-hackers]

On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 07:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:35 +0530, Sankar P wrote:
> > I don't see a high data content. There are Camel docs, plugin docs,
> > some design docs about shell and threading, most of which will have to
> > change anyway, soon. And most of the other links originating from the
> > go-evolution home page points to obsolete contents. There are some
> > test cases, but iirc they are stored in Novell testopia already.
We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though
they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold
true ;)

> <...snip...>
> > If all these does not convince you, you can save dollars on the
> > storage space for the site ;-) . So imho, it is definitely worth
> > moving to .
> +1  Well stated.  :)
I concur with this provided all the old data are still maintained.

- Chenthill.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]