Re: [Evolution-hackers] what's the f unction of RECURRENCE-ID

[Jules Colding <colding omesc com>]

On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 18:55 +0800, yanglin wrote:
>  
>  Yes, I got it. When an instance of an repeating event needs to be
> modified instead of the whole set of the events, the RECURRENCE-ID is
> useful. In other word,
> 
>  "To reschedule an event to a set of explicit dates/times but not
> replace the set with a new rule pattern, the sender shuld send a set
> of components with RECURRENCE-ID being set in each to handle the
> explicit override of the rule's date/time."
>  It seems that the libical doesn't provide the interface to remove an
> instance of a repeating event from the backend. Is that right?

See e-cal-backend-sync.h:L47 and e-cal.c.

HTH,
  jules