Re: [Evolution-hackers] ETree and gal
- From: DINH Viêt Hoà <dinh viet hoa free fr>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: DINH Viêt Hoà <dinh viet hoa free fr>, JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>, evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] ETree and gal
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:50:58 +0200
Not Zed wrote :
> > > > I have some fixes for the example of ETree.
> > > > And I am planning to use ETree in my own application (because
> > > > GtkTreeView/GtkTreeModel) have huge performance problem.
> > > > I am also planning to add some API (either by not modifying libgal or by
> > > > modifying libgal). I would like to know if development of libgal is
> > > > opened to changes ?
> > >
> > > We are about to kill development of gal outside of Evolution because no
> > > one else is currently using it.
> >
> > I was about to use that in my (open source) application.
> > Should I duplicate the code of GAL into my code ?
>
> Ugh. I'd highly recommend against it. You're entering a world of
> pain ...
>
> We want to try to kill etree as soon as we can; i'm almost inclined to
> just drop in gtktreeview ASAP, and then hope that this just forces the
> gtk+ maintainers to fix the performance issues.
>
> Apart from multiline select scaling miserably, if you use a custom
> model, and not the weird supplied models the performance isn't that much
> worse than etable.
GtkTreeView/GtkTreeModel design is broken since GtkTreePath is based on
indexes of elements in the table. That means that for each element, you
have to maintain its index: When you want to add or remove an element,
you have to update all the indexes of the elements of the sibling nodes.
Imagine you have a big amount of sibling nodes, performances are very
bad. The behavior is more correct with ETree.
Since this broken design of GtkTreePath is related to the API, I have a
doubt about GTK developers will change this.
I guess either I have to make my own treeview/treemodel based
on ETree ...
> > GAL had the advantage of being LGPL and not GPL.
>
> As opposed to? Evolution? I dont see the files changing license, but I
> also don't see it being usable outside of the tree, if we can help it.
I am currently using it outside of Evolution.
I have to customize it a little but basically, it works.
--
DINH V. Hoa,
"tuning et dope, aucun rapport" -- b.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]