Re: [Evolution-hackers] Patch Review process

Attachments are often broken in mailing list archives, so this is pretty
unreliable for getting at the patches. Attaching them in bugzilla is
much better for archiving the patches.

-- dobey

On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 15:34 +0530, Sarfraaz Ahmed wrote:
> > So, since the main reason for having patches in bugzilla is for
> > packagers to have an easier way to release updates, I'd suggest using
> > e-p and always attaching the bugs to bugzilla. That should work for
> > people preferring bugzilla querying.
> Hmm, how about always using e-p and giving links in bugzilla to the
> patches mail in e-p archives ? We could always add the "patch" keyword
> in bugzilla anyway. So, once we have a patch, we send it to e-p for
> review and add a link of that mail in bugzilla. [ This link would also
> help in browsing through all the replies to that patch. ]. But, may be
> we need to make it mandatory that all patches for a given bug submitted
> to e-p, should have its link added on in bugzilla, so that no patch is
> left out.
> --Sarfraaz

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]