Re: [Evolution-hackers] Does a Camel store live in a private process?

Yes, separate memory objects.

Not separate threads - which wouldn't make sense, how could you possibly
call any of its synchronous methods otherwise.

Behind the abstraction you can do whatever you want though, of course;
monitoring threads, thread per invocations, nothing special, etc.

On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 13:10 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 19:02 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> > No, they all share the same unix process (how could any pointers work
> > otherwise), for all stores of all types.
> So by "instances" he meant "instantiated as separate memory objects"? Do
> these instances live in separate threads?
adfa(evolution-2.4:20087): gtkhtml-WARNING **: cannot find icon:
'stock_insert-url' in gnome 

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]