Re: [Evolution-hackers] Indication of encrypted and/or verified signature
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj novell com>
- To: Ray Lee <ray madrabbit org>
- Cc: Carmine Greco <cgreco cisco com>, evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Indication of encrypted and/or verified signature
- Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:02:44 -0400
we don't know that until we render the part.
we render the message as we traverse the mime structure. things are
rendered (more or less) incrementally. that makes it a fair bit harder
to go changing the location of icons (well, that and abstractions)
Jeff
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:41 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:32 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > no, because it is possible to sign multiple individual parts rather than
> > the entire message, so we cannot move the icon to the top.
>
> Surely that would be by far the exception rather than the rule, no? So
> in the cases that the entire message is signed, the icon could be put at
> the top?
>
> And in cases where portions are signed, a different icon could be used
> at the top to indicate that it's mixed?
>
> ~r.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]