Re: [Evolution-hackers] Preliminary patches to add inline PGPsupport

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

> > Hmm, so how did the existing patch handle encrypted parts?  I thought
> > it just passed them to decrypt.  Why now are there extra changes
> > required to gpg-context?  Or did i miss something?
>
> It just passes them to decrypt. But there was a bug with it which I
> twigged to when Jeffrey mentioned that the current function is intended
> to decrypt an entire mime-part that is encrypted with gpg. 
>
> With the current patch the first 10 chars of the encrypted text
> mysteriously disappear never to be seen again! I'm guessing this is
> because the mime parser expects them to be some sort of mime header.

Ahhahh, yes, it should be a properly formed part.  Well you could add a preceeding blank line ... but I guess that will mess up the decryption/signing calculations?  If it doesn't, then that may be all you need(?).