Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel into eds

[JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>]

On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 13:55 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 06:56 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 18:49 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> 
> > > I'm thinking of doing some stuff where stable queues and the like are
> > > needed to do it properly, and libdb seems a reasonable way to do it.
> 
> > I dunno, maybe in this case, because its not data, its ok but we seem to
> > have had a lot of pain with libdb in the past, witness the threading
> > mutex issues on 64 bit platforms we just had.  I will say having our own
> > internal copy has helped a lot though.
> 
> I agree. Ideally we should try to become less dependent on libdb, and
> eventually get rid of it. IMO.

Well, this might be impossible unless we right our own code to extract
from the db files for migration purposes in the future.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.