Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel into eds



On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 06:56 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 18:49 +0800, Not Zed wrote:

> > I'm thinking of doing some stuff where stable queues and the like are
> > needed to do it properly, and libdb seems a reasonable way to do it.

> I dunno, maybe in this case, because its not data, its ok but we seem to
> have had a lot of pain with libdb in the past, witness the threading
> mutex issues on 64 bit platforms we just had.  I will say having our own
> internal copy has helped a lot though.

I agree. Ideally we should try to become less dependent on libdb, and
eventually get rid of it. IMO.

-- 
Hans Petter Jansson | <hpj novell com>
Evolution Developer | http://hp.cl.no/




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]