Re: [Evolution-hackers] posting to folders

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

> > I don't think this would make sense unless we just got rid of
> > CamelTransport entirely and just having it as virtual methods and
> > capability bits on CamelStore?
>
> I'm not really following why we need to merge the 2 objects. of course,
> it's late and I'm tired so maybe I'm just not seeing the obvious :-)
>
> >   Could this simplify the store is also a transport issue?(or if we
> > had interfaces on camelobjects and did it that way instead).
>
> Well, it'd likely reduce the boilerplate code. I'm not really sure how
> else it would simplify anything tho...

Connectors?

Don't we have to go through hoops now to setup a transport on a store?

And it should make any real difference to those where you can't.

Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com> Ximian Evolution and Free Software Developer

Novell, Inc.