Re: [Evolution-hackers] usage of C in evolution

[Trent Lloyd <lathiat bur st>]

first sign of insanity...

>    I'll follow up by talking to myself - which woudn't be the first time.
> 
>    I would _really like_ to be able to have evo extensibility, particularly
>    in a way which allowed additional languages to be used (even ones which we
>    don't grok).  Its still a bit of a way off - although certain things may
>    be possible already.  CORBA stuff like the importers are a primary
>    candidate right now though.
> 
>    Michael
> 
>    On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 21:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> 
>      Yes indeed.  Just trying to liven up the list. :)
> 
>      But honestly - personal preference only - python is unacceptable to me.
>      And if you can't have the core develpers writing the core app in their
>      chosen language, you're kinda up the sticky brown bit of flowing water
>      without a straight bit of wood, aren't you?
> 
>      On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 21:37 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> 
>  On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 20:43, Not Zed wrote:
>  > The problem with python is that it is a non-standard, toy kiddie
>  > language that makes pascal look advanced.
> 
>  Mmm... I smell flamebait ;-) 
> 
>  I've had the misfortune to use Pascal (On MacOS 7, no less), so I can't
>  agree with you personally. *shudders*
> 
>  Craig Ringer
> 
> 
> 
>     Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com>                                        
>                                                                 Novell, Inc.  
>     Ximian Evolution and Free Software Developer                              



-- 
Need advertising? Want to reach your consumer? For just $200 you can have
your advertisement in my signature for 2 months! cheap, just call 1800-SIGADS