Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: please help me to have a look at this.

[Bill Zhu <bill zhu sun com>]

you are right.
it's my fault.

在2004年02月19日的11:24，Jeffrey Stedfast写道：
> On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 22:16, Bill Zhu wrote:
> > Hi Jeff
> > I saw that this bug had been closed.
> > But I still wannt to say : I donn't wannt to just stop here. Because it
> > really make users feel inconvenient. Thinking of if I were the user of
> > evolution, if I meet a link in the mail which can be clicked, but there
> > is no any response after I clicked it. I would think this software is
> > terrible.
> 
> that's too bad. the current behaviour is correct. hacking it to work
> brokenly is broken.
> 
> >  
> > In my opinion, if it is not a link, why allow user to click it?
> 
> it *is* a link, it's just not a link that works.
> 
> >  and if
> > we allow user to click it, we should not make it have no response.
> 
> ok, how about an error dialog?
> 
> >  but 
> > not to ignore this, even if we donn't think it is a bug. 
> > I think maybe it is better if we add something to handle the situation
> > of "em-no-cid:". like cut off the "em-no-cid:" and pass it to
> > gnome_url_show just when user click the link.
> 
> this would be broken. want proof? test out the html on a web browser.
> 
> here, I've done the hard part for you:
> 
> http://primates.ximian.com/~fejj/proof.html
> 
> does that relative link work? no? surprise surprise. web browsers don't
> follow that link to http://www.ximian.com either. fancy that.
> 
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 在2004年02月19日的09:10，Jeffrey Stedfast写道：
> > > Actually, it turns out the 1.5 composer somehow generates the following
> > > when doing "insert link"
> > > 
> > > <FONT COLOR="#bluish"><U>www.ximian.com</U></FONT>
> > > 
> > > discovered that while trying to create a mail to show this "problem"
> > > earlier today.
> > > 
> > > Jeff
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 20:02, Not Zed wrote:
> > > > the only way i see this being fixed is for the gtkhtml editor to say 'oh
> > > > the user REALLY meant to insert a http link' and make it a non-relative
> > > > url.
> > > > 
> > > > the em-no-cid thing is just a side-effect, and it has to be there for
> > > > html mails.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 12:04 +0800, Bill Zhu wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > yeah,I have looked through the 1.5, the situation is almost the same.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On 二, 2004-02-17 at 19:52 +0100, Radek Doulík wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 11:26 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Radek: you seem to be discussing 1.5, while Bill seems to be talking
> > > > > > > about 1.4
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > which branch is the bug actually in?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I guess the bug is in both branches (I checked 1.5.x) Only the protocol
> > > > > > name changed? (cid: --> em-no-cid:)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Radek
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> > > > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> > > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
>