Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: please help me to have a look at this.
- From: Bill Zhu <bill zhu sun com>
- To: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- Cc: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>, Radek Doulík <rodo ximian com>, "evolution-hackers lists ximian com" <evolution-hackers lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: please help me to have a look at this.
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:16:47 +0800
Hi Jeff
I saw that this bug had been closed.
But I still wannt to say : I donn't wannt to just stop here. Because it
really make users feel inconvenient. Thinking of if I were the user of
evolution, if I meet a link in the mail which can be clicked, but there
is no any response after I clicked it. I would think this software is
terrible.
In my opinion, if it is not a link, why allow user to click it? and if
we allow user to click it, we should not make it have no response. but
not to ignore this, even if we donn't think it is a bug.
I think maybe it is better if we add something to handle the situation
of "em-no-cid:". like cut off the "em-no-cid:" and pass it to
gnome_url_show just when user click the link.
在2004年02月19日的09:10,Jeffrey Stedfast写道:
> Actually, it turns out the 1.5 composer somehow generates the following
> when doing "insert link"
>
> <FONT COLOR="#bluish"><U>www.ximian.com</U></FONT>
>
> discovered that while trying to create a mail to show this "problem"
> earlier today.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 20:02, Not Zed wrote:
> > the only way i see this being fixed is for the gtkhtml editor to say 'oh
> > the user REALLY meant to insert a http link' and make it a non-relative
> > url.
> >
> > the em-no-cid thing is just a side-effect, and it has to be there for
> > html mails.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 12:04 +0800, Bill Zhu wrote:
> >
> > > yeah,I have looked through the 1.5, the situation is almost the same.
> > >
> > > On 二, 2004-02-17 at 19:52 +0100, Radek Doulík wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 11:26 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Radek: you seem to be discussing 1.5, while Bill seems to be talking
> > > > > about 1.4
> > > > >
> > > > > which branch is the bug actually in?
> > > >
> > > > I guess the bug is in both branches (I checked 1.5.x) Only the protocol
> > > > name changed? (cid: --> em-no-cid:)
> > > >
> > > > Radek
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
> >
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]